Did they ever determine cause of death in the baby? Any subsequent proof emerging and then revealed in a book or documentary is surely something that should be taken seriously and investigated if necessary. And its argued that it has been and dismissed as insignificant or irrelevant. To prove it 110% rather than just 99% I dont know why they wouldnt retest the hair fibers etc. Above, we have another whos totally clueless, has little or no knowledge of this case, but is happy to display his/her ignorance with a rant based on limited knowledge learned from biased documentaries who thinks that by using offensive and insulting language itll influence those who support Rorrer into changing their opinions. Perhaps youre not aware, there was a great deal of evidence of which these documentaries made no mention, as well as misdeeds and incidents of corruption perpetrated by the cops. Today, Patricia Lynne Rorrer resides in State Correctional Institute at Muncy, a medium and maximum security facility that has the highest rate of cancer of all prisons in Pennsylvania, according to a story from northcentralpa.com. Strands of the accuseds dyed-blond hair at two crime scenes proved it. ALL IT THEN BECOMES IS A SOURCE OF INACCURACIES AND SPECULATION, WHICH ONLY SERVES TO BOLSTER THOSE WITH THAT MENTALITY AND PERPETUATE THE LACK OF TRUTH. Your somewhat convoluted explanation of discuss and express opinion, seems to ramble on and on without any logic or reason. Quote if I had known I would get caught, I would never have brought you into this world. Pat to Nicole her daughter. Patricias phone bill showed no record of a call to Catasauqua that day, but police noticed she didnt make any calls at all from her house in North Carolina that day either suggesting she could have been out of state and used a pay phone to dial up the Katrinaks. Counsel for Patricia Rorrer, 52, argued in Lehigh County Court that investigators mishandled DNA evidence, WFMZ-TV 69 reports. Clifford: I cant offer anything remotely novel or incisive. Ex-boyfriend Walter Blalock said that Patricia wanted him to be more like Andrew. He took two tests and there was deception detected in BOTH. As for Joanns parents, her father died a year after the murder. The Common Sense Guy you should put yourself on top of the list of deluded people. She is 100% guilty seen 2 programs on this awful murder and read about it as well. Narcissistic and violent tendencies are very common. I can't believe this bitch has a whole internet community rallying for her; have they SEEN the evidence? Testimony from Walter Blalock contradicted Patricias claim that she never had a gun. The Free Patricia Rorrer page responds to comments from supporters (How is this even possible that this woman is still in jail?!? Well of course it is, so you overstated your opinion as though you know it to be fact, thus the jury and others were wrong; ironic because youre quick to complain that others are much to sure of *their* opinion shes guilty. Her non-serious but potentially fatal (proximity to artery) injury could have been a half-hearted suicide attempt if not intentional other-incriminating. They did this case on Reasonable Doubt last night. The only record of a call from Patricia to the Katrinak household was on 12/7/94. That said, Im curious to know how you arrived at that decision about her guilt. A person tried in a court of law and then found guilty is not the be-all and end-all to the case. Your email address will not be published. DNA tests proved the blonde hairs were hers. They had a son, Alex Martin, in August of 1994. And for you to even ask why documentaries are biased, makes me wonder if you have the ability to determine fact from fiction! Together they had a baby girl, Nicole. Which, for this very reason, is at present being investigated by a federal judge? Look into it. She asked to speak with Andrew, who was home during the call; Joann refused. As to her duration on death row, no: inference cannot be made as to her guilt as theres a woman with about the same time (Holberg) and another with almost as much. The missing hairs probably got destroyed in testing.. thats how they test them.. and reports are wrong all the time. So much of it, it would take all day to elaborate here. RR, Watch the Forensic Files episode on YouTube. In a million years, she wouldnt do anything to harm that.. A lot of these documentaries feature most of the theories suggested by the cops and prosecution which were most damaging to her case, but not a single person to substantiate Rorrers side, or to challenge their versions. Dance defense. At 17, Patricia dropped out of high school and married landscaper Gary Gabard. ), And in another bombshell, Joanns good friend Karen Devine said Joann planned to leave Andrew after the holidays. Thus Im confident shes the perp probably mentally disturbed at the time (the thought of her rationally, coolly killing her babies is too horrible), though probably not to the standard for criminal mitigation. Stop trying to prove that everyone who is prosecuted is rightfully prosecuted. They depict scenes which are pure speculation or exaggeration or present scenes, which in fact were only theories mentioned at her trial. She didnt kill those two boys and TX knows, but they made too much noise about it, hence this is probably the real reason that Darlie hasnt been put to death 24-25 yrs later. With Joann Katrinak, Alex Katrinak, Patricia Rorrer. In fact it clearly shows how short you are on all the details surrounding this case. Sorry, I must have missed your name on the witness list. There are innocent people in prison. Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Find out more Our Mission Patricia's Story Our Mission Is to get Patricia a fair trial that will prove her innocence, and give justice to Joann and Alex who died a horrific death. If you want to help her let her find peace by admitting her wrong and asking God for forgiveness. Your pathetic attempt to insult not only shows a not very original comment, but clearly displays a lack of intelligence. Susan Wright is out of prison after killing her husband in TX. They really need to set her free and open the case and look at the husband. Its nothing short of a feeble stab hoping to impress but really amounts to splitting hairs, or to put it another way, hot air with no substance. But then again I havent actually SEEN the evidence. Have you watched any of the documentaries Ive mentioned? According to a Morning Call account from March 5, 1998: McIntyre leaned forward conspiratorially like someone trying to persuade another to tell a secret, lowered his voice and said: Heres what I want to know: After you killed Joann Katrinak, did you kill that baby or just leave it to die?. After one bullet didnt kill Joann, the gun locked up, so Patricia had to beat her to death, according to the prosecution. They need to test that hair from Joanns hand and also that broken fingernail. All of them returned without a DNA analysis because they contained no root material. THE COPS SET HER UP. Thats all for this post. Andy did end up moving to Colorado with her and the last time I checked, they were still together. Cop defends accused. Microconidia DNA, as long as the strand is one inch long they can pull the DNA from that. More hairs there. Ms. I believe in Patricias innocence and she deserves to be freed, at last! This woman was obsessed and jealous. Well, at least you managed some sense there when you say that, especially when you take into account the amount of evidence and witnesses which were withheld from the Defence and what appears to be a clear case of evidence-tampering. This article is little more than fiction. I have worked for Interpol for years as a gun analyst, usually women who commit such crimes against their exes wife or mistress, lover etc are pushed from behind by a man and promises and lies. and there are probably many people who still think he is innocent too. Were I a prosecutor I would consider the aforementioned characterisation technically false and failing in probity. Ep 205 - Clair Hour 1: Black or White TV-MA | 53 MINS | 2020 And about the only thing from your comment with which I can agree, is you saying thats not proof theyre right in reference to their verdict. Police say Rorrer put a .22-caliber bullet in the mother's head, strangled the baby and placed him . Not everything is a conspiracy. Clearly, there are a lot of irrational people out there. Shes extremely, extremely happy with the baby. Its never been made clear. Dial-a-problem. Her jealousy and rage because Joann told her to not contact her husband set her off. Thats not proof theyre right but its more likely that you as one person are wrong. Detective Barry Grube found it odd that Andrew fixed the severed phone line before police examined it in essence tampering with evidence. . Any subsequent proof emerging and then revealed in a book or documentary is surely something that should be taken seriously and investigated if necessary. Whoever writes this amateurish swill should get a real life, andsa real job. Im aware of Rorrers various appeals, but also aware that the bases for those appeals is to some degree unknown to observers, who rely on third-party reporting which may distort. Shes just extremely happy with Andy, her brother, Michael OConnor, told the media. Joanns first husband, New Jersey construction worker Michael Jack, who had reportedly abused her during their marriage, also had a solid alibi. When she stood trial that same year, she maintained her innocence and alleged that she and Andrew Katrinak had continued to stay in touch as good friends, so she wouldn't do anything to hurt him. Joann was fun, likable, beautiful, always happy, said her sister-in-law Cindy Wiard. Were suppose to ignore the actual forensic evidence and forensic opinions because we were told that a cop overheard her claiming she confessed? I dont see any defining comment or wording that justifies that claim. On December 14, 2020, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court denied Ms. Rorrer's petition for allowance of appeal, concluding her state appellate proceedings. I accept there are a couple of remarks which can be seen that way but they are in direct response to those whove been offensive in the first place. The evidence was all there. But unfortunately other than God only two people know exactly what really happened and one is not alive. They retested hair from the car in 2008 with updated new technology. Its an opinion learnt from a well-researched book, from documentaries which show and mention a great deal of facts and evidence which was never brought up at her trial. You are not expressing an opinion but making an assertion or claim of fact: [I] have absolutely no doubt she was railroaded and wrongfully convicted. You are claiming innocence as fact there is no doubt shes innocent. Phone records dont lie.) The first rule of a murder is motive. A person tried in a court of law and then found guilty is not the be-all and end-all to the case. I was like OK, maybe she was tired, you know with a new baby. If that really is the case, the husbands alibi for a date months before becomes irrelevant. Women like Barbara Stager who killed her husband in Durham NC. How would an intruder find it? Proven in court and sentence awarded!!! Hoist by my own petard! Did you personally attend the trial? Youre right about my comments on other sites, but those seem to have an abundance of hate-mongers who feel no need to mince their words hence my retorts to those. This article seems to have a great many errors and omissions, more by design, I fancy, than a need to tell the story objectively. Omg so well put! I do. The media love the femme fatale., FBI lab blunder. It might have said no root but could have been wrong. Discuss and express opinion; stop short of asserting that those of the other view (that of judge and jury, at least) are ignorant of facts and wrong, and youre right, because by definition its reasonable for lay people to accept the jury verdict. This woman killed and is where she belongs! False. I just watched Reasonable Dont on this case. On Alexs diaper bag, police found strands of the same type of hair from the car. There is pendency of DNA investigation for Routier. Search it out and check for yourself. Ive heard she gets to go out to LUNCH and this broad is in prison for murdering her husband Russ Stager? If documentaries are, as you claim, biased against Rorrer, the obvious question is why. Required fields are marked *. His favorite rattle, shaped like a phone, lay near the crime scene. She was convicted nearly 25 years ago of kidnapping and murdering Joann and Alex Katrinak, the wife and infant son of Rorrer's ex-boyfriend Andrew Katrinak. She only spoke on the phone with him a couple of times a year; when she called that last time, she didnt even know if Andys child was a boy or a girl, and the baby was almost 4 months old. Update/Clean-Up. Tommy Lynn Sells admitted to killing a 9-10 old boy in Indiana I think and the mom Julie (cant remember her last name) was jailed mainly due to the ex-husband (father of her son) testified and said things that werent true. The only thing that has changed since this case is the ability of people to access and proclaim crackpot ideas, conspiracies, and all the rest. So we can just pretend that everyone is honest all of the time? I deduced my opinion to be fact because of what Ive read and seen and is supported by evidence which was never disclosed at her trial. Its nine minutes into the video. What evidence is there she actually left the state? It has very bad energy. Your comment could not be farther than the truth! The obvious, if moot, response to this is to observe that her conviction wasnt based on inaccurate documentaries but on trial. True, Andrew would have no way to acquire and plant Patricias blond hair there because it wasnt that color when she knew him. See Commonwealth v. Rorrer, CP-39- CR-0002176-1997 (C.C.P. Then 31 years old, she had lived a rocky existence. Still, no good leads materialized. And she would just call out of the blue., According to the Free Patricia Rorrer page on Facebook:I called him to let him know that I was going to the USA finals for a horse show. The prosecution alleged that after the murder, Patricia drove Joanns car to McCartys parking lot and backed it into a parking space. And Patricia did live in another state. The Worldwide Womens Criminal Justice Networks website also points to a bombshell: In 2015, the Justice Department acknowledged that most of the team members from an FBI microscopic hair comparison unit gave prosecutors flawed data from 1980 to 2000 that could have unjustly contributed to a number convictions including Patricia Rorrers.

Will There Be A Synchronic 2, How Long To Cook Cornish Hens At 300 Degrees, Articles P