1, p. 52 [August 31, 1847]. In Britain, a different approach was taken by men who also chose to think themselves smarter than Gods Word. Oct. 17th Hort: I have been persuaded for many years that Mary-worship and Jesus-worship have very much in common in their causes and their results. (Life, Vol.II, p.50). 1, p. 94 [November 11, 1847]. Ben Abraham.com gives a list of comparisons (only a few mentioned here as examples). Only what we actually find, is that W&H were simply repeating the same textual nonsense as can be found in the earlier Jesuit Douay version! Newman declared that the principles of Roman Catholicism could be taught in the Church of England under the Thirty-Nine Articles. . But, on the whole, it offers a reliable vision of the Word of God, which can lead men to the New World, that is, to the Messianic Kingdom". . 1860 Apr. This cannot be any text resting solely on our own judgment, even if we were not too inexperienced to make one; but it must be supported by a clear and obvious preponderance of evidence. [127] He added that "most of the differences are due to the greater accuracy of the NW as a literal, conservative translation". In 1851, Hort and Westcott started the Ghost Society which over the years included some of the most influential intellectuals in England including future Prime Minister Arthur Balfour. Are the Modern Versions Based on Westcott-Hort? - Way of Life Literature They are important: 1 Papal tradition is on a level with Scripture. In other words, the Jesuits had put forth one Bible in English, that of 1582, as we have seen; of course they could get out another.(Hunt). Jesuits were used by popes in an attempt to destroy the reformation, by inventing new Greek texts, which were not new at all, but reworkings of old heresies. cit., Vol. 1858 Oct. 21st Further I agree with them in condemning many leading specific doctrines of the popular theology as, to say the least, containing much superstition and immorality of a very pernmicious kindThe positive doctrines even of the Evangelicals seem to me perverted rather than untrueThere are, I fear, still more serious differences between us on the subject of authority, and especially the authority of the Bible (Life, Vol.I, p.400). He gave the name of Thomas Cartwright, Puritan divine, saying thatThe sun does not shine on a greater scholar than Cartwright.. Westcott & Hort: Translator's Beliefs 1857 Feb. 23rd Hort to Westcott: I hope to go on with the New Testament text more unremittingly (Life, Vol.I, p.355). and what shall be the sign of thy coming, and of the end of the world?4And Jesus answered and said unto them, Take heed that no man deceive you.5For many shall come in my name, saying, I am Christ; and shall deceive many. And His father and mother were marvelling upon those things which were spoken concerning Him., (3) AMERICAN REVISED;And His father and His mother were marveling at the things which were spoken concerning Him.. They saw, that armed ONLY with the Latin, they could fight no longer. Warfield is here saying something important for those who want to know the origin of the new versions. It is even found in the paganistic occult beliefs of Hinduism! Of course they were! The translators use the terms "Hebrew-Aramaic Scriptures" and "Christian Greek Scriptures" rather than "Old Testament" and "New Testament", stating that the use of "testament" was based on a misunderstanding of 2 Corinthians 3:14. [15], Until the release of the New World Translation, Jehovah's Witnesses in English-speaking countries primarily used the King James Version. Generally speaking Wescott and Hort favored the Alexandrian text, which they called the "Neutral Text . (Dr. G. Vance Smith, a Unitarian scholar, was a member of the Revision Committee. Pope Leo XIII later made him a cardinal. FENTON JOHN ANTHONY HORT (1828-1892) A. Hulsean Professor of Divinity, then Lady Margaret Professor of Divinity, Cambridge B. It was the Christians who replaced the Tetragrammaton by Kyrios, when the divine name written in Hebrew letters was not understood any more. June 4th Westcott to Lightfoot: Ought we not to have a conference before the first meeting for Revision? [30][31] Cross references which had appeared in the six separate volumes were updated and included in the complete volume in the 1984 revision. How can they, when the very bibles they use are from the clawed hands of Jesuits and Rome? Hort, MacMillan and Co., London, 1896, vols. The Greek master text by the Cambridge University scholars B. F. Westcott and F. J. Without doubt new versions support Rome in its deceptions. He writes concerning the Sinaiticus.. From the facts, therefore, we deduce: first that the IMPURITY of the codex Sinaiticus, in every part of it, was fully recognized by those who were best acquainted with it, and that from the very beginning until the time when it was finally cast aside as worthless for the practical purpose. But, then along came Luther, who fanned the flames of the Reformation! As has already been established, both Drs. Satan knoweth that he hath but a short time. In Old Testament criticism, the concept of documentary hypothesis won the thinking of the liberals. [The personal letters of Hort and Westcott sound like the letters of men of the Jesuit order (that is, if you know the Roman Catholic Jesuits. "[117], In 1963, theologian Anthony A. Hoekema wrote, "Their New World Translation of the Bible is by no means an objective rendering of the sacred text into modern English, but is a biased translation in which many of the peculiar teachings of the Watchtower Society are smuggled into the text of the Bible itself. "[57] He also considers that old manuscripts containing the tetragram, like the papyrus Fouad 266, "is evidence of a secondary stage. These men are obviously led by the spirit but I am not entirely sure it is Holy. It is a sad thing when men make merchandise of the Word of God.(Gipp). [73] In 2004, the NWT was released on compact disc in MP3 format in major languages. which I should tempt no one to share.(Op. A. Hort (1828-1892), the towering pioneers of the textual criticism of the Greek New Testament. In the Gospels alone Codex B (Vaticanus) leaves out words or whole clauses no less than 1,491 times. And this simple fact should warn all who use the new versions that something bad is afoot, for anything Rome does is always for its own ends, and for the destruction of Protestant truth, as found in scripture. These features were discontinued in the 2013 release. 1861 Apr. Newman, then, paved the way for the coming of Westcott & Hort and their abominable new versions, based as they were on the Alexandrian texts and other heretical sources. On one side, their supporters have heralded them as great men of God, having greatly advanced the search for the original Greek text. Clearly, Westcott and Hort were Occult practitioners during the time that they were revising the Greek Text of the New Testament. Moderate but not evangelical Since 1994, the New World Translation of the Holy ScripturesWith References has been included in the Watchtower Library on CD-ROM. Most of our other colleges and universities in North America have, since the early 1980s, swung into the orbit. All of the above constituted a direct attack on the Bible. Friedrich Schleiermacher rejected creeds and doctrines, declaring that all that mattered in religion was feeling. Like Rotherham, though, it is often not smooth reading. Modern theology was seriously affected by the so-called Enlightenment and its aftereffects, which declared that man and human reason were more important than God and divine revelation. It has been noted that Sinaiticus is a literary mess (scionofzion.com): There are mistakes, erasures, sentences written on top of other sentences plus many words are omitted. Westcott and Horts Greek New Testament is the source text for many of todays modern Bible translations. Ignorant people are now saying that the Authorized King James Bible is wrong because they have believed the scholarship of these two blaspheming infidels. "New World Translation of the Christian Greek Scriptures", Watchtower October 1st, 1960 p. 601 para. Let me put it this way The letter A remains the letter A no matter how many times it is reproduced. To say that new version readers who cannot see this are deceived is an understatement! Test. But I say to you, love your enemies, do good to them that hate you: and pray for them that persecute and abuse you., (3) AMERICAN REVISED. "[108] Metzger said there were a number of "indefensible" characteristics of the translation, including its use of "Jehovah" in the New Testament. [132][129] In rebuttal, Thomas Howe strongly criticized BeDuhn's positive review of the New World Translation, stating that BeDuhn's main goal is to deny the deity of Christ. This charge created a sensation . It must be askedwhythe majority of Christians today are reading new versions, when they are founded on mostly Romanist manuscripts, one of them probably a fake? Reprinted with kind permission from theTraditional Text Pamphlets Homepage and compiled byDavid Blunt of the James Begg Society. Russia Will Not Tolerate Any More Casualties in Gaza Israel INCREASES Attacks! Both of these underpin all modern versions. The quote is from a letter to Westcott on 17th October, 1865), I have been persuaded for many years that Mary-worship and Jesus worship have very much in common in their causes and results.. Westcott And Hort Occultists Or Christians You Decide 11x 17 Westcott formed a club while an undergraduate at Cambridge called Hermes.2 Hermes is another name for Satan and was bi-sexual or androgynous. Rowley, How Not To Translate the Bible, The Expository Times, 1953; 65; 41. 1870 Westcott and Hort print tentative edition of their Greek N.T. The true Bible turns unlearned and ignorant men into gospel preachers and casts out all fear.. "Stand Complete and With Firm ConvictionThe New World Translation Appreciated by Millions Worldwide". They cast away the authentic documents underlying the KJAV and instead brought in their own Roman corrupt sources, as prepared by Tischendorf. I cannot determine how much we must believe; how much, in fact, is necessarily required of a member of the Church. (Life, Vol.I, p.46). THE WESTCOTT & HORT CONSPIRACY - THE TRUE STORY OF OUR MODERN BIBLE TRANSLATIONS RESOURCES Disclaimer Introduction Symphony of Truth In a Nutshell Topical Guide 5-144000 5 Commissions 10 Commandments 333 NCCG Number 144,000, The A Action Stations Agency, Free Alcohol Angels Anointing Apostles Apostolic Interviews Apostolic Epistles Thus, the Douay we now have is not the original and has been altered extensively over the past several hundred years. Not only this, but: The Rheims-Douay and the King James Version were published LESS than THIRTY years apart..The Rheims-Douay has been REPEATEDLY changed to APPROXIMATE the King James. Look at the aims of Rome: The true Bible is the arch-enemy of the Roman Catholic Church. 1865 Sept. 27th Westcott: I have been trying to recall my impressions of La Salette (a marian shrine). The Reformation became a great schism. These serious accusations are made with very strong evidence from the letters of both . Under the direction of the Translation Services Department, translation of the Old Testament in a particular language may be completed in as little as two years. Answer Brooke Westcott and Fenton Hort were 19th-century theologians and Bible scholars. Once Latin became the exclusive playground of the scholars, the texts could not be checked. Both the Vaticanus and the Sinaiticus LEAVE OUT the last 12 verses of Mark. He concluded that the Gospel records are nothing more than a collection of myths which portrayed truths about mans existence rather than telling about actual historical events. In order to understand the New Testament, according to Bultmann, it is necessary to demythologize them. (worldincrisis). The vernacular terms are then applied to the text in the target language. Here was his clear acknowledgement of what most scholars already knew: thousands of manuscripts from different countries in different ages, said the SAME thing! Beza was a humble man and politely wrote back that Elizabeth had a far more able scholar than himself, in England itself. In short, the Irvingite creed (minus the belief in the superior claims of the Irvingite communion) seems to me unassailable in things ecclesiastical. (Life, Vol.II, p.30,31). "[62] However, the translators of the New World Translation believed that the name Jehovah was present in the original manuscripts of the New Testament when quoting from the Old Testament, but replaced with the other terms by later copyists. The Queen was dismayed because she really wanted someone from the Anglican or Presbyterian folds. In 1984, a Reference edition of the New World Translation was released in addition to a revision of the regular volume. So, she did not contact Cartwright. ", Sistine and Clementine Revised Latin Texts, Names and titles of God in the New Testament, The Kingdom Interlinear Translation of the Greek Scriptures, "Jehovah's Witnesses Reach Translation Milestone With Bible Release in Mozambique", "The New World Translation of the Christian Greek Scriptures Now Available in Krio", "Principles of Bible Translation from Hebrew and Greek | NWT", "Baybul we De Insay di Langwej we Pipul dn De Tk vride", "Jehovah's Witnesses' adoption of digitally-mediated services during Covid-19 pandemic", JW.org, "The 2013 Revision of the New World Translation". [128][129] For each passage, he compared the Greek text with the renderings of each English translation, and looked for biased attempts to change the meaning. July 31st Hort: I spoke of the gloomy prospect, should the Evangelicals carry on their present victory so as to alter the Services. (Life, Vol.I, p.160). "[135], The Evangelical German Bible Society reviewed the German-language edition of 1986 and described the NWT as a "translation that is accurate in many respects, but tendentious in the sense of the special teachings of Jehovah's Witnesses". Nov. 17th Westcott: As far as I could judge, the idea of La Salette was that of God revealing Himself now, and not in one form but in many. (Life, Vol.I. His Histoire Criticque du Vieux Testament (1678), arguing from the existence of duplicate accounts of the same incident and variations of style, denied that Moses was the author of the Pentateuch. pp.251,252). THE WESTCOTT & HORT CONSPIRACY - nccg.org revisers, of which they were members).

Ati Virtual Scenario Vital Signs Quizlet, Craigslist Captain Fantastic Pinball, Can You Play Sports If You Transfer High Schools, Pantalone Funeral Home, Guilford College Baseball Schedule, Articles W